Blog

CMMC Phase 2 pause: Why CMMC compliance work should continue

CMMC Phase 2 is paused, but that doesn't mean organizations should stop preparing. The standards behind CMMC remain relevant, and organizations that continue investing in readiness will be better positioned for whatever comes next.

Marc St-Pierre headshot

Marc St-Pierre

Last update: October 20, 2026•6 min read

Share

Key takeaways

  • CMMC Phase 2 is paused, but Phase 1 self-assessment requirements remain in place.
  • Cybersecurity obligations tied to NIST, DFARS and SPRS do not disappear because certification timelines change.
  • Organizations should keep improving security controls, documentation, evidence and governance.
  • The pause gives organizations more time to strengthen CMMC readiness and address security gaps.

You've been working toward CMMC compliance and recent program changes left you wondering whether to continue investing in CMMC readiness, you're not alone. The good news is that cybersecurity obligations remain regardless of how certification requirements evolve. Organizations are still expected to protect sensitive information, maintain appropriate security controls and accurately assess their cybersecurity posture. The organizations that use this period to strengthen governance, documentation and operational security will be better positioned regardless of how future certification requirements are implemented.

This article focuses on what recent changes to CMMC implementation mean and what organizations should do next to maintain CMMC readiness.

What is CMMC Phase 2?

CMMC stands for Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification. The program is designed to verify that defense contractors and subcontractors protect Federal Contract Information (FCI) and Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) at the level required by their contracts. Phase 2 was intended to expand the rollout beyond Phase 1 by allowing additional assessment requirements, including third-party assessments for applicable CMMC Level 2 contracts. Phase 2 is now paused, while Phase 1 self-assessment requirements remain in place.

What does the CMMC Phase 2 pause mean for CMMC compliance?

Recent changes to the rollout of CMMC certification requirements have created uncertainty across the Defense Industrial Base.

For many organizations, the immediate question is whether they should continue investing in cybersecurity readiness. The answer is yes.

While certification timelines and implementation details may evolve, the need to protect sensitive information has not changed. Organizations should avoid viewing compliance program changes as a reduction in cybersecurity expectations.

CMMC compliance requirements that remain unchanged

The headlines may create the impression that organizations can slow down their cybersecurity efforts. That would be a mistake.

CMMC is built on security and compliance obligations that many defence contractors are already expected to follow. These obligations include established cybersecurity frameworks, contractual requirements and assessment processes, including NIST security requirements, DFARS cybersecurity obligations and SPRS assessment and reporting requirements. These requirements existed before CMMC certification became a major focus and continue to apply regardless of changes to certification timelines.

Changes to certification activities do not change an organization's responsibility to:

  • protect sensitive information
  • maintain appropriate security controls
  • accurately assess cybersecurity posture
  • support compliance claims with evidence and documentation
  • continue improving security maturity

This distinction matters. CMMC did not create the need for cybersecurity. It created a framework for validating that cybersecurity controls are actually being implemented.

Understanding CMMC Phase 1 and CMMC Level 2

CMMC was designed as a phased approach to improving cybersecurity assurance throughout the defence supply chain.

The early stages focused on helping organizations understand their requirements, assess their current security posture and prepare for more formal validation activities. Subsequent phases were intended to introduce additional verification requirements for organizations handling more sensitive information.

As implementation continues to evolve, organizations should focus less on specific timelines and more on building the cybersecurity capabilities required to support long-term compliance and operational resilience.

Why CMMC readiness still matters

Cyber threats do not operate according to compliance schedules.

The risks that originally drove the development of CMMC remain the same today. Defence contractors continue to be attractive targets because they often possess valuable intellectual property, sensitive government information and trusted positions within larger supply chains.

For many organizations, the greatest challenge has never been an assessment. It has been CMMC readiness.

Common issues include:

  • incomplete documentation
  • inconsistent policies
  • gaps in control implementation
  • insufficient evidence collection
  • weak governance processes

The current period of uncertainty provides an opportunity to address those challenges while organizations continue strengthening their cybersecurity programs.

Organizations that continue strengthening their security programs are generally better positioned to adapt to changing requirements than those that delay cybersecurity improvements until new deadlines emerge.

CMMC readiness steps during the Phase 2 pause

Treat this period as additional preparation time rather than a stop signal.

Organizations should consider focusing on the following areas:

  • Review security controls and identify gaps.
  • Improve policies, standards and supporting documentation.
  • Ensure assessments accurately reflect the current environment.
  • Maintain evidence that demonstrates controls are operating as intended.
  • Strengthen governance and accountability for cybersecurity initiatives.
  • Continue addressing remediation items and outstanding security findings.

These activities improve both cybersecurity outcomes and future CMMC compliance readiness.

CMMC compliance vs. cybersecurity

One of the most important lessons from recent program changes is that cybersecurity and compliance should not be viewed as interchangeable.

Compliance requirements may change. Certification timelines may move. Programs may be updated or revised.

Cybersecurity responsibilities remain.

Organizations that focus only on passing an assessment often struggle when requirements evolve. Organizations that focus on building strong security programs are typically better positioned to adapt to new compliance frameworks, changing regulations and emerging threats.

The most resilient organizations view compliance as one outcome of a mature cybersecurity program rather than the primary objective.

How OpenText™ helps organizations prepare for CMMC compliance

Preparing for CMMC is not simply a compliance exercise. Organizations must understand which requirements apply to their environment, assess their current posture, identify gaps, maintain supporting evidence and demonstrate that controls are operating effectively.

OpenText Cybersecurity Services helps organizations build a defensible security and compliance program through governance, risk and compliance advisory services, cybersecurity assessments, security strategy development and ongoing readiness support. For organizations requiring ongoing operational support, OpenText Managed Security Services provides managed detection and response, vulnerability management, incident response retainers and continuous security monitoring to help reduce risk while supporting long-term compliance objectives.

OpenText Managed Security Services: https://www.opentext.com/services/managed-security-services

Ready to strengthen your CMMC compliance readiness?

Whether you're assessing your current cybersecurity posture, preparing for future compliance requirements or building a long-term security strategy, OpenText can help.

Learn more about OpenText Managed Security Services and Cyber Resilience Services, or contact our team to discuss your organization's CMMC readiness, cybersecurity and compliance objectives.

OpenText Cyber Resilience Services: https://www.opentext.com/services/cyber-resilience-services

CMMC readiness after the Phase 2 pause

Changes to certification programs and compliance frameworks can create uncertainty, but they should not create complacency.

Organizations that continue investing in governance, documentation, security controls and operational readiness will be better prepared regardless of how compliance requirements evolve. The strongest response to uncertainty is not to stop. It is to use the additional time to strengthen the foundations that cybersecurity programs depend on.

In Part 2 of this series, we'll look at what organizations should do during the CMMC Phase 2 pause, why self-assessments matter more than ever and how OpenText can help strengthen cybersecurity and compliance readiness.

Frequently asked questions about the CMMC Phase 2 pause

No. CMMC Phase 2 has been paused, but organizations should continue to monitor current requirements and the clauses in their contracts and solicitations.

Yes. Organizations should continue strengthening security controls, documentation, governance and evidence collection to support CMMC readiness.

CMMC Level 2 applies to organizations that handle Controlled Unclassified Information and is aligned with the security requirements in NIST SP 800-171.

Organizations should review security controls, update policies and documentation, keep assessments current, retain evidence and continue addressing security gaps.

Share
Marc St-Pierre headshot

Marc St-Pierre

Marc St-Pierre is Regional Vice President and Senior Director of Consulting Services at OpenText, focused on AI, LegalTech, and security consulting delivery. He leads global teams promoting analytics, AI, and semantic technologies within OpenText's enterprise information management portfolio, drawing on 16 years with the company. Marc holds a Bachelor's degree in Computer Science from Concordia University and is a MITRE Engenuity ATT&CK Evaluations Managed Services participant. He is dedicated to helping organizations translate emerging technology into practical, secure business outcomes.